Subject to Change, version 2.0
I'm a goddamed liberal. Deal with it.

Subscribe to "Subject to Change, version 2.0" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Saturday, June 25, 2005

Eminent Domain.

I don't know whether the Supreme Court's eminent domain decision was, substantively, a good thing or a bad thing. I don't know whether there are too few obstacles in the way of regional development and redevelopment (and that there should be more obstacles to reduce the impact of corrupt ties between local governments and developers) or whether there are too many obstacles (and too little gets done because opportunities for hold-up are just too great). I do know that the reasoning of the majority opinion seems to be really dumb. A correspondent writes: Re: footnote 6: And while the City intends to transfer certain of the parcels to a private developer in a long-term lease--which developer, in turn, is expected to lease the office space and so forth to other private tenants--the identities of those private parties were not known when the plan was adopted. It is, of course, difficult to accuse the government of having taken A's property to benefit the private interests of B when the identity of B was unknown. Well, I guess that proves that anyone who takes the time to read the chapter of Robert Caro's The Power Broker assigned in American History doesn't have...

[Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal]
2:07:19 PM    

Understanding the Current State of Energy Supply and Demand.

Scott Lemieux asked a very good question in the comments a couple of posts ago: "Roughly what percentage of energy consumption is taken up by the internal combustion engine, and what by energy production? The higher the latter, the more...

 [Ezra Klein]
2:03:52 PM    

Further Translations from the Krugmanomicon

Shrillness … mad unholy shrillness … worming through my brainlike a dream from which there is no awaking. The world seems different to me now, so different from the carefree, sunlit world I once knew - terrifying, alien, a soulless emptyness, a nameless hunger, dead-yet-undying, an ancient, malevolent Thing whose smallest horror, were it to be apprehended truly, would blast the mind of the strongest mortal to insensate ash. I try to tell myself that it is just because they cancelled “Joan of Arcadia”, but I know it is not the case … for it is not the world that has changed, no - it is I! It is that blasphemeous book which my own impish perversity compelled me to read, that hateful manuscript printed out by an ancient 9-pin dot matrix printer of fiendish design, that … that … Krugmanomicon!

How long has it been since first I read those tenebrous pages ? A month? A week? An ocean of years? I cannot say, any more than I can say what drove me to translate the rude, low pidgin binary written thereon into some semblence of human ASCII. I have wandered far, since then, ‘neath the dead and uncaring stars, twinkling in bitter malice within the black void of space. I could not escape the shrillness of that book, and, if truth be told, I would not have escaped it if I could. For I am part of the shrillness now, and the shrillness is part of me, for in a world as mad as this one, only the shrill are truly sane! And now I have the book in my hands again - I know not how, nor do I recall my name, and I do not care to remember either - I shall taste this awful shrillness again, and be flung howling and babbling into the void! Behold :

Leading the nation wrongfully into war strikes at the heart of democracy. It would have been an unprecedented abuse of power even if the war hadn’t turned into a military and moral quagmire. And we won’t be able to get out of that quagmire until we face up to the reality of how we got in. […]

Still, some of my colleagues insist that we should let bygones be bygones. The question, they say, is what we do now. But they’re wrong: it’s crucial that those responsible for the war be held to account.

Let me explain. The United States will soon have to start reducing force levels in Iraq, or risk seeing the volunteer Army collapse. Yet the administration and its supporters have effectively prevented any adult discussion of the need to get out.

On one side, the people who sold this war, unable to face up to the fact that their fantasies of a splendid little war have led to disaster, are still peddling illusions: the insurgency is in its “last throes,” says Dick Cheney. On the other, they still have moderates and even liberals intimidated: anyone who suggests that the United States will have to settle for something that falls far short of victory is accused of being unpatriotic.

We need to deprive these people of their ability to mislead and intimidate. And the best way to do that is to make it clear that the people who led us to war on false pretenses have no credibility, and no right to lecture the rest of us about patriotism.

The good news is that the public seems ready to hear that message - readier than the media are to deliver it. Major media organizations still act as if only a small, left-wing fringe believes that we were misled into war, but that “fringe” now comprises much if not most of the population.

In a Gallup poll taken in early April - that is, before the release of the Downing Street Memo - 50 percent of those polled agreed with the proposition that the administration “deliberately misled the American public” about Iraq’s W.M.D. In a new Rasmussen poll, 49 percent said that Mr. Bush was more responsible for the war than Saddam Hussein, versus 44 percent who blamed Saddam.

Once the media catch up with the public, we’ll be able to start talking seriously about how to get out of Iraq.

Aaaiii! Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Krugman R’lyeh wagn’nagl fhtagn! Aaaiii!!!! Aaaaaaaaiiiiiiiii!!!!!!!!!!

- andrew

10:14:46 AM    

Six sites to email
Andy notices that six of Our Leader's most faithful congregations need a little encouragement.

And Elaine has a new recruitment poster .

- Gen. JC Christian, Patriot [Jesus' General]
5:34:11 AM    

My inner Frenchman is threatening to show Ofjoshua my collection of Udders: The Magazine for Red State Men if I don't let him post, so I guess I'll step away from the keyboard for a few minutes.

I don't like to interrupt the General, but occasionally something happens that requires me to break through the fourth wall and speak in my own voice. It's impossible to resist this impulse, because my heart demands that the truth be spoken. I hope you'll forgive me for this indulgence.

I'm seething with anger over Rove's assertion that people like you and I want our soldiers to come home in bodybags. Such a statement is unforgivable. It would not matter if it was a mistake, an unfortunate phrase spoken in anger. It would still be despicable.

It appears, however, that it was something more than loose words uttered at a weak moment: it's part of a calculated strategy to turn those of us who opposed the war into scapegoats for its failure. It's reminiscent of the scapegoating of Jews by German nationalists after WWW I. This new Bush strategy transcends being merely despicable; it is evil.

When you're the father of two beautiful daughters, your house becomes a gathering place for young men. That was certainly the case when my daughters were in high school. We were lucky, most of them were good kids. I spent quite a bit of time with them and got to know them very well.

Now they're coming home from war. The all American boy with a heart of gold talks of his hate for "hajis" and wishes we could nuke the place. The class clown sits in his room all day staring at the Cartoon Channel while self medicating with pot and booze. The nice liberal Jewish boy who melted my wife's yenta heart tells us in a dispassionate, far-away monotone that "killing those animals was like stepping on ants." Our "son" screams at night.

My heart breaks for these boys we adopted in their teenage years. They've lost their souls. And for what?

War does this to people. That's why it should never be entered into unless there is no other alternative. That wasn't the case for this war. As far as I can tell, we invaded Iraq because Bush and the necons wanted to be remembered as great men like Roosevelt or Lincoln, or perhaps more accurately, Augustus. It's there in the subtext of PNAC papers for all to see. The oil is just gravy. That's evil.

My greatest hope when I started posting about Operation Yellow Elephant was that I'd help make College Republicans a laughing stock. It offends me that these children of privilege--I'm referring to their most visible leadership--are so gung ho for a war they refuse to fight. It's as if they believe that the fighting should be left to the inferior lesser classes while they perform the intellectual heavy lifting--it's their birthright.

We need to beat these bastards. We need to have a presence, a non-violent presence, at the convention. Don't look for a leader; look for a map and get down there, now. Show them that we're not going to allow them to blame us for the evil they've accomplished. Be creative. Think of it as open source activism.


The Bush legacy .
- Gen. JC Christian, Patriot

 [Jesus' General]
5:31:57 AM    

Enjoying the calm before the storm. The summer continues along in its usual pattern, and both ourselves and the Europeans have yet to encounter the peak of the tourist travel season. Already, despite the prediction of economists that this would not happen before the end of the year, we are at $60 oil. Remember that once we have reached peak travel for the year, then we move into the purchase and storage of heating oil for the winter. And during both these events demand will continue to grow, and the supply reserve that has been stored away will gradually whittle down toward zero. Which means that it might be optimistic to assume that oil might stay under $75 this year, let alone next.

Next year actually may not get much worse than this, since there are some new projects that should pump oil into the supply, but it all depends on how fast existing fields deplete, with the news on that front, to date, being none-too-good. This is therefore going to be a time when we really don’t need to offend those who can help us the most. Bear in mind that history has shown that giving offense in the Middle East can have significant immediate effects, and in today’s economy the effects will likely be more far-reaching and severe.

It therefore seems odd (as I noted last post) that the Administration is both hinting that we would encourage a change in Government structure in Saudi Arabia, and is allowing consideration of our being allowed to sue OPEC (hat tip to Past Peak.)

It is fine to play the Godfather when you hold all the marbles, but when the issue is in serious doubt, then (as we have found with Iraq) playing out the game with a known weak hand can significantly cost us oil supply, rather than guaranteeing it.

Apart from proving my nerdishness, perhaps also a brief comment on why this year I came to Alaska. I have posted earlier about this being the last quiet summer, and thus it seemed the best time to take the trip that I have always promised the Actress (the pseudonymous spouse) while it still remains practical and affordable. With the price changes, and their impact, that have now begun their inexorable movement, I do think that we made the trip not a moment too soon.

Go to the postings for today

Technorati Tags: , By (Heading out). [The Oil Drum]
5:16:09 AM    


 Tom Delay and Dan Bartlett are defending uncle Karl. Delay provided an articulate defense of the raging Rover, Dub couldn't have said it any better. Dan Bartlett on the other hand spun a story only his mother would believe. Is Olbermann right was it just Delay's failure to practice reading through the remarks before quoting them, or is this guy on something.?

Click on Picture to Play Quicktime Video 2.54MB 2'04
Quicktime Required (free download)...

5:15:05 AM    

We Just Happened To Be Going the Same Way.

If you haven't read or heard Barack Obama's commencement speech, given at Knox College, here's a few paragraphs to whet your appetite.

5:13:04 AM    

Under the Wire.

I know Cheney promised to string up the next Administration official who dared suggest bailing on Guantanamo. This cover, though, demonstrates the boldness (or perhaps, the foolishness) of such a stance. TIME doesn't do these dramatic black covers very...

5:12:02 AM    

Words to the wise.

Cancer, Baby writes:

So instead I give you this small piece of advice: Be very careful who you piss off in a hospital parking lot. You can't necessarily tell that people are sick just by looking at them, so don't...

5:11:28 AM    

Pointer From Idyllwild.

Ezra here. This post of Brad Plumer's on different explanations for America's strangely absent universal health system is fantastic, you should all read it. Moreover, I'd love to see [guest blogger] Matt Holt's response.

Alrighty-then. Back to vacation. ...

[Ezra Klein]
5:06:31 AM    

The Plame Affair to come off the backburner?

We should know Monday: The justices of the Supreme Court on Thursday debated whether to take on the cases of Matt Cooper (search), a Time magazine reporter, and Judith Miller (search), a reporter at the New York Times. Both have refused to comply with federal subpoenas over the outing of former CIA official Valerie Plame's (search) identity. The decision whether to grant certiorari, or take the...

- Lambert
5:05:33 AM    

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Michael Mussington.
Last update: 7/1/2005; 6:37:38 AM.
June 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
May   Jul